[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date index][Thread index]
st: Subscription costs
At 06:39 AM 4/15/2004, Ronán Conroy wrote:
I know this is a tangent but I object to this kind of twisting of facts.
The RESEARCH might have been paid to some extent (or not) by taxpayers
(although, if I wanted to be equally incendiary, I would point out that
it's typically the US taxpayers, certainly not the Irish, who foot that
bill). However, the publication costs are not covered. And $35 is dirt
cheap compared to any other scientific publication to which you want to
compare it. As for "free" open access publishing, nothing is free in life.
Someone does indeed pick up the costs for such peer reviewed publication.
It's just not the consumer at this time (but eventually it will be -- just
wait and see).
The paper from Barros and Hirakata, which includes the Stata code for each
of the models, is free (another cheer for open-access publishing) as against
the 35 bucks that the Am J Epidemiol want in order for us to access research
that the taxpayer has already paid for once...
Ronan M Conroy (firstname.lastname@example.org)
Lecturer in Biostatistics
Royal College of Surgeons
Dublin 2, Ireland
+353 1 402 2431 (fax 2764)
The documents accompanying this transmission may contain confidential
health or business information. This information is intended for the use of
the individual or entity named above. If you have received this information
in error, please notify the sender immediately and arrange for the return
or destruction of these documents.
Constantine Daskalakis, ScD
Biostatistics Section, Thomas Jefferson University,
211 S. 9th St. #602, Philadelphia, PA 19107
* For searches and help try: