Stata The Stata listserver
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date index][Thread index]

RE: st: ORs for non-rare outcomes


From   "Moran, John (NWAHS)" <John.Moran@nwahs.sa.gov.au>
To   "'statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu'" <statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu>
Subject   RE: st: ORs for non-rare outcomes
Date   Fri, 9 Apr 2004 11:08:33 +0930

I have used V8 binreg quite successfully with v large data sets; seems to be
"better" with ml option.

john.moran@nwahs.sa.gov.au


-----Original Message-----
From: jmpsouza@usp.br [mailto:jmpsouza@usp.br] 
Sent: Friday, April 09, 2004 10:48 AM
To: statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu
Subject: Re: st: ORs for non-rare outcomes


Citando Ronán Conroy <rconroy@rcsi.ie>:

> on 08/04/2004 11:25, Marcello Pagano at pagano@hsph.harvard.edu wrote:
> 
> > Some have this aversion to odds which is difficult to understand.  
> > But I
think
> even the racing fraternity would have trouble understanding the ratio 
> between the odds of each of two horses winning.
> 
Dear people:
I agree. Anyway, the -binreg- command would be really a good solution, if it
would run more often than not run. Indeed, it seems that the odds of binreg
be able to run is less than 1. Cheers, Jose Maria 
> 
> 
Jose Maria Pacheco de Souza
jmpsouza@usp.br
*
*   For searches and help try:
*   http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/res/findit.html
*   http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
*   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/

*
*   For searches and help try:
*   http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/res/findit.html
*   http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
*   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/



© Copyright 1996–2014 StataCorp LP   |   Terms of use   |   Privacy   |   Contact us   |   What's new   |   Site index