I should add to my earlier posting, that I realise one can have a -for
each- loop nested inside another -for each- loop, but I hope that is
not the answer to my query. If so, it means several lines of code
instead of just one.
And, if one fully exploits -for- (with a third placeholder Z), then it
would mean even more lines of code in -for each- to replicate this
behaviour.
--
Kind regards,
Ian
=================================
Ian Watson
Senior Researcher
acirrt
University of Sydney
NSW 2006
Australia
Phone: 02 9351 5622
Fax: 02 9351 5615
Email: [email protected]
Web: www.acirrt.com
================================
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/res/findit.html
* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
