[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date index][Thread index]

From |
"Jan Lambrecht" <lambrecht@wiwi.uni-frankfurt.de> |

To |
<statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu>, <n.j.cox@durham.ac.uk> |

Subject |
AW: st: RE: confusion about psmatch2 |

Date |
Mon, 29 Mar 2004 10:39:07 +0200 |

Hi Lijun, why would you want to compare OLS regression coefficients with a matched sample average? I think, your question might be explained by your data: The OLS coefficient for college does not only measure the true/caual influence of college on income, but also the influence of other variables (such as gender, age and race) on college attendance. But the coefficient has not necessarily to be larger than the causal influence you obtain after matching, as there might be compensating effects. Example: Suppose that men generally have a higher income than women and that also more men get a college degree. Then, after matching, your matched sample includes mostly men (as your treatment group mostly consists of men, your control group also mostly consists of men). Averaging over this subset of your observations leads to a higher average effect of education on income because you omit the (lower) income bracket, consisting mostly of women. OLS estimation on the other hand estimates the effect (causal or not) of college on income for _all_ observations, thus including the lower income bracket and thus leading to a lower estimate of the 'influence' of education on income. Jan -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- Von: owner-statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu [mailto:owner-statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu]Im Auftrag von Lijun Song Gesendet: Sonntag, 28. März 2004 03:07 An: n.j.cox@durham.ac.uk Cc: statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu Betreff: Re: st: RE: confusion about psmatch2 Hi, All, I provide an example in detail here. 1) I first got the effect of college on income using OLS: reg income college female age white; 2) Then, I use propensity score matching as follows: psmatch college age sibs masei pasei,out(income) ate cal (.05) n (1); However, the estimated coefficient of college using OLS is smaller than the ATT and ATE derived from Propensity score matching. Usually estimates from Propensity score matching should be less conservative or smaller than estimates of OLS, right? It seems that OLS ignores matching the pre-treatment characteristics, so estimates of OLS maybe be overstated, right? Lijun ---------- Original message ---------- From: n.j.cox@durham.ac.uk To: statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu Sent: Saturday, March 27, 2004 5:24:09 PM Subject: st: RE: confusion about psmatch2 There's stuff here I've never heard about. Can you explain how OLS can estimate "causal effects" please? Nick n.j.cox@durham.ac.uk Lijun Song > As a beginner at Stata, I am confused about the psmatch2. > > Suppose I am interested in the causal effect of college (a 1-0 > treatment indicator) on income. I also assume that race, sex, and > family background (such as Mother and Father's SEI) will > influence the > treatment assignment. I also could not deny that race,sex, and family > background also influence the outcome of interests, income directly. > > Then, after regressing income on college, I arrive at an estimated > coffecient. After that, I use "psmatch2 college race sex masei pasei". > I think the causal effect estimated by OLS estimator should be higher > than those by Propensity Score Matching right? > > But my results show that the causal effect estimated by OLS > is smaller > than these by Propensity Score Matching. Why? > > In addition, the causal effect estimated by OLS is ATT or ATE? * * For searches and help try: * http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/res/findit.html * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/ * * For searches and help try: * http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/res/findit.html * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/ * * For searches and help try: * http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/res/findit.html * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/

**References**:**Re: st: RE: confusion about psmatch2***From:*"Lijun Song" <ls8@duke.edu>

- Prev by Date:
**st: another large data set question** - Next by Date:
**st: RE: RE: RE: Stata errors large data** - Previous by thread:
**Re: st: RE: confusion about psmatch2** - Next by thread:
**st: expected survival new Stata command** - Index(es):

© Copyright 1996–2016 StataCorp LP | Terms of use | Privacy | Contact us | What's new | Site index |