[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date index][Thread index]

From |
"Lijun Song" <ls8@duke.edu> |

To |
<statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu> |

Subject |
st: confusion about psmatch2 |

Date |
Sat, 27 Mar 2004 11:44:20 -0500 |

Hi, As a beginner at Stata, I am confused about the psmatch2. Suppose I am interested in the causal effect of college (a 1-0 treatment indicator) on income. I also assume that race, sex, and family background (such as Mother and Father's SEI) will influence the treatment assignment. I also could not deny that race,sex, and family background also influence the outcome of interests, income directly. Then, after regressing income on college, I arrive at an estimated coffecient. After that, I use "psmatch2 college race sex masei pasei". I think the causal effect estimated by OLS estimator should be higher than those by Propensity Score Matching right? But my results show that the causal effect estimated by OLS is smaller than these by Propensity Score Matching. Why? In addition, the causal effect estimated by OLS is ATT or ATE? Thanks. Lijun ---------- Original message ---------- From: n.j.cox@durham.ac.uk To: statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu Sent: Saturday, March 27, 2004 3:54:26 PM Subject: st: RE: Date Data/Asserts You identify the problems very clearly, and you are aware of some useful tools here. However, a variable so messy is not going to surrender faced with just a single weapon of mess dissection. Here's one way of proceeding. I copied your data and argued as follows. 1. The value is most commonly the first word of the string, but we want it as a number. . gen fvalue = real(word(ferritin,1)) (140 missing values generated) 2. The date is most commonly the second word of the string, interpreted as a (recent) daily date. . gen fdate = date(word(ferritin,2),"mdy",2050) (162 missing values generated) 3. I see lots of values with "U"s. I want to check that when "U" occurs it occurs only as itself. . assert ferritin == "U" if index(ferritin, "U") Here -assert- says nothing. No news is good news, i.e. Stata assents to the assertion. (In this case, all "U"s are bad news, i.e. no information at all.) 4. So I know all about the "U" problem. What values are missing, but not because of "U"? . list ferritin fvalue if mi(fvalue) & ferritin != "U" +------------------------+ | ferritin fvalue | |------------------------| 178. | normal . | 225. | . | 286. | >1400 3/24/99 . | 324. | > 2K 1/7/02 . | +------------------------+ You have to decide what to do about these. 5. What dates are missing, but not because of these? . list ferritin fdate if mi(fdate) & ferritin != "U" +---------------------------+ | ferritin fdate | |---------------------------| 66. | 5760 5/02 . | 70. | 4968 . | 98. | 4782 6/02 . | 117. | 1137 4/02 . | 121. | 3237 3/01 . | |---------------------------| 126. | 1060 8/02 . | 148. | 1422 ng/ml 3/1998 . | 154. | 1014 8/01 . | 178. | normal . | 209. | 646 mg/ml 9/2000 . | |---------------------------| 210. | 1938 . | 212. | 127 . | 225. | . | 278. | 129 6/00 . | 289. | 2000 . | |---------------------------| 300. | 4995 . | 301. | 2748 9/02 . | 302. | 187 3/2000 . | 303. | 489 . | 305. | 3564 11/01 . | |---------------------------| 307. | 862 1990 . | 324. | > 2K 1/7/02 . | 333. | 3039 2/02 . | 338. | 1777 ng/ml 5/02 . | 352. | 40 3/02 . | |---------------------------| 357. | 953 . | +---------------------------+ Similarly, you have to decide what to do here. There are, it seems, various kinds of problem: * No date supplied. * A year only supplied. * A month and year only supplied. * A day, month and year supplied. * More than two words in the string. In fact, we would have been better off trying to extract the date from -word(ferritin,-1)-, and that would yield one further daily date. You can use -assert- to test for truth or falsity. Thus . assert 42 == int(42) asserts that 42 is an integer. More usefully . assert x == int(x) asserts that -x- contains integer values only, as only for integers is -x- unchanged by applying the -int()- function. Similarly . assert real(date(stringvar, "mdy", 2050)) < . asserts that all values of stringvar can be treated as daily dates. By itself -assert- has very little syntax, and using it requires knowledge of other parts of Stata. Nick n.j.cox@durham.ac.uk Ward Hagar > > I am new to Stata and new to databases. I've been trying to > get an access database "Stata ready". I can insheet it well > and have "cleaned up" most of the variables. However, I've > hit a snag with one variable named "Ferritin", reproduced > below for those interested. (n= 362). > > My goal is to separate the value form the date. > > But note: > 1. Most have a four digit value > 2. Many have a date of the test in an inconsistent format > 3. Many have "U" for unknown > 4. One has "normal" for a value > 5. A few have the ">" operator before the value > 6. One has the units for the measurement > > > I've tried the date() functions, split, and word() and all > cause some other problem. > > This is important because the ferritin is the first of a list > of similarly (mis)coded variables. > > Is there a Stata-esque approach to this, or am I left with > line-by-line cleanup? > > Second question is whether ASSERT can be used to test whether > a value is a date, integer, string, etc? > > Many thanks. > > . l ferritin > > +-------------------+ > | ferritin | > |-------------------| > 1. | 540 11/6/02 | > 2. | U | > 348. | U | > 349. | U | > 350. | 132 2/20/02 | > |-------------------| > 351. | U | > 352. | 40 3/02 | > 353. | 97 3/29/02 | > 354. | 6151 5/22/02 | > 355. | U | > |-------------------| > 356. | 1390 5/8/02 | > 357. | 953 | > 358. | 54 8/2/02 | > 359. | 2779 8/12/02 | > 360. | U | > |-------------------| > 361. | U | > 362. | U | > +-------------------+ * * For searches and help try: * http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/res/findit.html * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/ * * For searches and help try: * http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/res/findit.html * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/

- Prev by Date:
**st: RE: I gather the graphics commands book is way out of conformity** - Next by Date:
**st: RE: merging variable labels** - Previous by thread:
**st: RE: I gather the graphics commands book is way out of conformity** - Next by thread:
**st: RE: confusion about psmatch2** - Index(es):

© Copyright 1996–2015 StataCorp LP | Terms of use | Privacy | Contact us | What's new | Site index |