[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date index][Thread index]

From |
"Renzo Comolli" <renzo.comolli@yale.edu> |

To |
<statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu> |

Subject |
Re: st: OT: your favorite math equations editor |

Date |
Wed, 17 Mar 2004 21:16:13 -0500 |

Dear Mary, My first reaction when I read your message was "define the word good" :) Given that your colleague wants to use Powerpoints, I suggest he goes either with Equation Editor or MathType. Equation Editor is just the free version of MathType. Of course, Equation Editor has fewer with fewer functionalities than MathType. As both John Wallace and Richard Williams have told you, Equation Editor comes free with MS Office, but it is not installed by default you have to use the MS Office disk (or if it was installed via the LAN I imagine there is an equivalent way). I would start using Equation Editor, because if you decide to upgrade to MathType, MathType automatically recognizes whatever you have done with Equation Editor, so no work is wasted. I personally use MathType, Marcello Pagano already talked about it. MathType does not have the problem Nick Cox is talking about (i.e. it let you uses the fonts you want, so you can create both text and equations with the same fonts and it looks great) MathType (and I think Equation Editor too, but I am not sure) integrates very well with Powerpoints. For instance, you can create a Powerpoint slide with an equation in it and then you can animate the pieces of the equation having variables moving around on the screen and saying "this represents income" (or whatever you want) and then go back to the original place in the equation -- very cool to teach undergrads and MBAs The downside is that it is a bit slow to write up complicated formulae. I also used Scientific WorkPlace mentioned by Dimitriy V. Masterov but I did not use the latest version, I used version 3.5 Scientific WorkPlace is much faster to type than MathType, but it is not WYSIWYG (what you see is what you get) and formatting can be a pain. In the version I used if you had a long equation in a parenthesis, it would not go to the next line, it would just print out of the page and the manual says (I am not kidding) "if you know LaTex you know how to fix it". I never bothered with it anymore. But than again, all economists (except me) use it, so it can't be that bad and maybe it's better in the new release. Best, Renzo * From "Mary (Merlin) Marshall" <marshall.11@osu.edu> To statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu Subject st: OT: your favorite math equations editor Date Wed, 17 Mar 2004 13:41:33 -0500 Greetings Statalist, I have a collegue who teaches dynamic and thermodynamic meteorology at Ohio State University. His operating system is Micro$oft Win2000 (maybe Win98). He has been thinking about using Powerpoint to teach his classes, but his lectures involve deriving lots of equations and he does not have a good equation editor. This equation editor would also be used to generate equations in research articles for publication in meteorology journals. So, I have a question for all of you using the Windows operating system who must write a lot of equations in your publications, lectures, etc. What editor would you recommend/what is your favorite editor? If you have experience with more than one equation editor, what were the pluses and minuses of each? Thanks, Merlin Marshall marshall.11@osu.edu * * For searches and help try: * http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/res/findit.html * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/

**Follow-Ups**:**Re: st: OT: your favorite math equations editor***From:*Richard Williams <Richard.A.Williams.5@nd.edu>

- Prev by Date:
**st: svylogit subpop F** - Next by Date:
**Re: st: PROC MIXED** - Previous by thread:
**RE: st: OT: your favorite math equations editor** - Next by thread:
**Re: st: OT: your favorite math equations editor** - Index(es):

© Copyright 1996–2016 StataCorp LP | Terms of use | Privacy | Contact us | What's new | Site index |