[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date index][Thread index]

From |
Kit Baum <baum@bc.edu> |

To |
statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu |

Subject |
st: Re: handling of MV in summary stats |

Date |
Wed, 17 Dec 2003 09:18:46 -0500 |

On Dec 17, 2003, at 2:33 AM, David wrote:

Note that for commands that take several variables together, they generallyAn important exception to this general rule involves the 'r...' egen functions, which perform spreadsheet-like operations across variables (and thus provide an alternative to doing something like

work on the set of observations having no missing values on all the

variables under consideration.

gen avg = (x1+x2+x3)/3

which will indeed be missing if any component is missing.

egen avg = rmean(x1 x2 x3)

will not behave the same way; it computes the mean from what is available, and the associated rmiss() will give you the effective divisors. The r... functions are very useful, but one must read the help carefully to know how each one will deal with MVs. (I once had a problem with egen rsd(), row standard deviation, which ignores MVs; it returned zero if _all_ arguments were missing. I agreed with Stata's developers that there was no variance across those variables, but argued successfully that the rule that a function of NaNs should return a NaN should trump the statistical logic!)

Kit

*

* For searches and help try:

* http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/res/findit.html

* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq

* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/

- Prev by Date:
**re: st: manuals** - Next by Date:
**st: Book review: Statistical Modeling for Biomedical Researchers** - Previous by thread:
**re: st: manuals** - Next by thread:
**st: Book review: Statistical Modeling for Biomedical Researchers** - Index(es):

© Copyright 1996–2017 StataCorp LLC | Terms of use | Privacy | Contact us | What's new | Site index |