[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date index][Thread index]

From |
David Kantor <dkantor@jhu.edu> |

To |
statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu |

Subject |
Re: st: Re: Is Stata smart enough to avoid unnecessary repetition? |

Date |
Mon, 15 Dec 2003 09:30:55 -0500 |

I might add that certain sets of commands work together in this way, as they are really the same underlying model, done with the same computation. For example,

-probit- and -dprobit-. They run the same computation, but display the results in a different form. You can run either one; then subsequently you can type either one of these commands without arguments to get whichever form of display you want (without having the model redone).

-- David

At 02:31 PM 12/14/2003 -0500, Michael Blasnik you wrote:

If you type out the full command, then Stata will re-do the analysis. Replaying results will prove to be much faster than re-estimating the command, especially when you're working with large datasets or complex estimation commands. Michael Blasnik michael.blasnik@verizon.net ----- Original Message ----- From: "Richard Williams" <Richard.A.Williams.5@nd.edu> Sent: Saturday, December 13, 2003 7:29 PM > Is Stata smart enough to know when it already has the necessary information > calculated for an estimation command? For example, if I do > > regress y x1 x2 x3 > regress y x1 x2 x3 [...]

David Kantor Institute for Policy Studies Johns Hopkins University dkantor@jhu.edu 410-516-5404 * * For searches and help try: * http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/res/findit.html * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/

**References**:**st: Is Stata smart enough to avoid unnecessary repetition?***From:*Richard Williams <Richard.A.Williams.5@nd.edu>

**st: Re: Is Stata smart enough to avoid unnecessary repetition?***From:*"Michael Blasnik" <michael.blasnik@verizon.net>

- Prev by Date:
**st: Properly specifying orthogonal contrasts after -stcox-** - Next by Date:
**st: pwd** - Previous by thread:
**st: Re: Is Stata smart enough to avoid unnecessary repetition?** - Next by thread:
**st: log-linear model** - Index(es):

© Copyright 1996–2016 StataCorp LP | Terms of use | Privacy | Contact us | What's new | Site index |