Stata The Stata listserver
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date index][Thread index]

Re: st: panel within transformation cause serial correlation?

From   "Enrico Pellizzoni" <>
Subject   Re: st: panel within transformation cause serial correlation?
Date   Fri, 12 Dec 2003 16:01:13 +0100

I remember within estimator is surely serially correlated.

Anyway, this estimator is still consistent, even if it is not efficient.

That's why the coefficient estimated with your transofrmation 1 and 2 are numerically identical, but I suppose your
standard errors are different in the 2 transformations


Enrico Pellizzoni
Borsa Italiana Spa
Research & Development
Piazza Affari, 6 - 20123 Milano
Tel: 02 72426 304
Fax: 02 86464323

                      <>           To:                                            
                      Sent by:                         cc:                                                                                 
                      owner-statalist@hsphsun2.        Subject:  st: panel within transformation cause serial correlation?                 
                      12/12/2003 15.53                                                                                                     
                      Please respond to                                                                                                    

Dear listers,

In a typical panel data model with individual fixed effect, we have

   y_{it} = a_i + B*X + e_{it}, --- (1)

where a_i is individual effect. Assume e_{it} is iid distributed for
i and t. A standard estimation procedure is to first do the "within"
transformation to get rid of the potentially large number of the a_i
dummies. The transformation essentially subtracts the group means
from the variables:

  y_{it} -y_{i.} = B*(X_{it}-X_{i.}) + (e_{it}-e_{i.}),  -- (2)

where e_{i.} = (1/T) *(e_{i1} + e_{i2} + ... + e_{iT}).

It can be shown numerically that OLS estimations on models (1) and
(2) give you exactly the same results.

My question is: In model (2), the transformed error term
(e_{it}-e_{i.}) seems to be serially correlated within any given
individual (i.e., for any i), but the OLS estimation assumes no
correlation. Thus, how come the serial correlation can be ignored
in estimating (2), and the results are still the same as (1)?

To be more clear, consider the transformed error terms of individual
i in period t and t-1. They are

 (e_{it}-e{i.})   = e_{it}   - (1/T) *(e_{i1} + e_{i2} + ... +
 (e_{it-1}-e{i.}) = e_{it-1} - (1/T) *(e_{i1} + e_{i2} + ... +

. I think they are correlated because of the common term on the RHS
of the expressions.

Any insight will be appreciated.


Do you Yahoo!?
New Yahoo! Photos - easier uploading and sharing.
*   For searches and help try:

L'utilizzo non  autorizzato  del  presente  messaggio  Ŕ  vietato  e  potrebbe costituire  reato. Se il presente
messaggio non e' a Lei indirizzato, Le saremmo grati  se,  via  e-mail,  ne  comunicasse  l'errata  ricezione. Il
contenuto del presente  messaggio  non deve essere considerato come trasmesso o autorizzato da Borsa Italiana. Borsa
Italiana non si assume alcuna responsabilitÓ per eventuali intercettazioni, modifiche o danneggiamenti del presente
messaggio e-mail.

The unauthorized use of this e-mail is prohibited and could constitute an offence. Please notify Borsa Italiana
immediately by reply e-mail if you are not the intended recepient. The contents of this message shall be understood as
neither given nor endorsed by Borsa Italiana. Borsa Italiana does not accept liability for corruption, interception or
amendment, if any, or the consequences thereof.

(Embedded image moved to file: pic22279.pcx)

Attachment: pic22279.pcx
Description: Binary data

© Copyright 1996–2017 StataCorp LLC   |   Terms of use   |   Privacy   |   Contact us   |   What's new   |   Site index