Stata The Stata listserver
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date index][Thread index]

st: any shortcut for oaxaca decomposition


From   "Ada Ma" <pelikan_4001@hotmail.com>
To   statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu
Subject   st: any shortcut for oaxaca decomposition
Date   Tue, 25 Nov 2003 12:19:57 +0000

Hi,

I am doing some oaxaca decompositions and I'm looking for some shortcuts, thus I ran the two following estimations:

[1] separate estimations for male and female: wage = alpha + beta1*gamma + beta2*zeta

[2] one estimation, but with interactive dummies (female = 1 for women)
wage = alpha + beta1*gamma + beta2*zeta + beta3*female + beta4*female*gamma + beta5*female*zeta

Now my question is why is it that the estimated beta1 in [2] differ from that of beta1 in the male estimation in [1]? And why is it that the summation of beta1 and beta4 in estimation [2] would equal to beta1 for females in estimation [1]?

I know I'm making different assumptions regarding the error terms in estimations [1] and [2], but what elses are driving the differences?

Many thanks in advance.

Cheers,
Ada Ma

-----------------------------------------
Dept of Econ
Univ of Aberdeen
Pelikan_4001@hotmail.com

_________________________________________________________________
Stay in touch with absent friends - get MSN Messenger http://www.msn.co.uk/messenger

*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/res/findit.html
* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/




© Copyright 1996–2014 StataCorp LP   |   Terms of use   |   Privacy   |   Contact us   |   What's new   |   Site index