Stata The Stata listserver
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date index][Thread index]

Re: st: Why t- rather than z-statistics in svylogit?


From   Richard Williams <[email protected]>
To   [email protected], "statalist hsphsun2.harvard.edu" <[email protected]>
Subject   Re: st: Why t- rather than z-statistics in svylogit?
Date   Mon, 24 Nov 2003 10:25:28 -0500

At 03:03 PM 11/24/2003 +0000, Ronan Conroy wrote:
on 24/11/2003 14:25, Richard Williams at [email protected] wrote:

This is discussed on p. 357 of the Stata 8 Users guide (see point #2).  I
can't say that I fully understand the explanation, but the key phrase seems
to be "Using z rather than t statistics only yields a nontrivial difference
when there is a small number of clusters (<50)."

That strikes me as not an entirely unmeaningless statement. Does this mean
that the difference is important in any case when the number of clusters
goes above fifty? It could be clearer, so.

Incidentally, I live with someone who occasionally uses modified triple
negatives in conversation. Makes life colourful.
My head was spinning a bit too. My interpretation of the complete paragraph is that (1) t statistics are actually what is technically correct even when z statistics are reported by Stata (2) when the number of clusters is small, the difference between t and z is trivial (3) when the number of clusters is large (>50) the difference between t and z is not trivial (or at least need not be trivial). If that is an incorrect interpretation, maybe somebody who understands the svy commands can explain it better.

-----------------------------------------
Richard Williams, Associate Professor
OFFICE: (574)631-6668, (574)631-6463
FAX: (574)288-4373
HOME: (574)289-5227
EMAIL: [email protected]
WWW (personal): http://www.nd.edu/~rwilliam
WWW (department): http://www.nd.edu/~soc

*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/res/findit.html
* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/




© Copyright 1996–2024 StataCorp LLC   |   Terms of use   |   Privacy   |   Contact us   |   What's new   |   Site index