[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date index][Thread index]

From |
Richard Williams <Richard.A.Williams.5@nd.edu> |

To |
statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu |

Subject |
Re: st: Why t- rather than z-statistics in svylogit? |

Date |
Mon, 24 Nov 2003 09:25:09 -0500 |

At 01:37 PM 11/24/2003 +0000, Neumayer,E wrote:

Hi,This is discussed on p. 357 of the Stata 8 Users guide (see point #2). I can't say that I fully understand the explanation, but the key phrase seems to be "Using z rather than t statistics only yields a nontrivial difference when there is a small number of clusters (<50)."

I was surprised to find that svylogit produces t-statistics rather than z-statistics. Logit produces t-statistics as one would expect. Anybody knows the answer?

-------------------------------------------

Richard Williams, Associate Professor

OFFICE: (574)631-6668, (574)631-6463

FAX: (574)288-4373

HOME: (574)289-5227

EMAIL: Richard.A.Williams.5@ND.Edu

WWW (personal): http://www.nd.edu/~rwilliam

WWW (department): http://www.nd.edu/~soc

*

* For searches and help try:

* http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/res/findit.html

* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq

* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/

**References**:**st: Why t- rather than z-statistics in svylogit?***From:*"Neumayer,E" <E.Neumayer@lse.ac.uk>

- Prev by Date:
**st: conditional logistic regression** - Next by Date:
**st: xtgls** - Previous by thread:
**st: Why t- rather than z-statistics in svylogit?** - Next by thread:
**Re: st: Why t- rather than z-statistics in svylogit?** - Index(es):

© Copyright 1996–2016 StataCorp LP | Terms of use | Privacy | Contact us | What's new | Site index |