[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date index][Thread index]

From |
"Nick Cox" <n.j.cox@durham.ac.uk> |

To |
<statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu> |

Subject |
st: RE: Re: Analysis of binary cluster data with missing values |

Date |
Thu, 13 Nov 2003 11:39:07 -0000 |

I assume "row" means "leg" or "limb". I don't think this is a Stata issue, as Stata's behaviour appears correct given the data and what you ask of it. Please explain why you think your by-hand analysis is correct. I don't think you can collapse the table in this way. A test of that is that if you reverse the table you cannot recover even a subset of the data correctly, as you do not have complete data on 6 limbs. Rather, you have complete data on 5 limbs only, as Stata is telling you. Nick n.j.cox@durham.ac.uk Louise Linsell > I have a dataset that looks something like this - each person has > observations on 2 hips and 2 knees and I wish to calcuate > the odds ratio > of hips to knees, taking account of the clustering within > person using > robust standard errors. > > id hip knee row > 1 1 0 1 > 1 1 0 2 (1=replaced, 2=not replaced) > 2 . 1 3 > 2 0 1 4 > 3 1 0 5 > 3 0 . 6 > 4 1 0 7 > 4 . . 8 > > I have tried all of the following commands > > logistic hip knee, cluster(id) > xtlogit hip knee, i(id) or > svymean hip, by(knee) > > but all of them drop any record (line) with a missing value > (.), so in > the above dataset, rows 3, 6 and 8 would be dropped, > despite there being > a non-missing observation in the other group that should be > included in > the analysis. This gives incorrect estimates for the odds > ratio when you > calculate them by hand from the equivalent 2x2 table. e.g from the > above example, if I was calculating the OR by hand I would get > > yes (1) no (0) > > hips 4 2 > > knees 2 4 > > OR = (4X4)/(2X2) = 4 > > However if all the rows with the missing values are dropped, you get > > yes (1) no (0) > > hips 4 1 > > knees 1 4 > > OR = (4X4)/(1X1) = 16 > > Any ideas or suggestions on how to calculate the correct > odds ratio and > robust s.e. would be much appreciated. * * For searches and help try: * http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/res/findit.html * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/

**References**:**st: Re: Analysis of binary cluster data with missing values***From:*"Louise Linsell" <louise.linsell@public-health.oxford.ac.uk>

- Prev by Date:
**RE: st: -gammafit-, -pgamma- and -qgamma- packages on SSC** - Next by Date:
**st: Re: Cox/Jenkins gammafit package** - Previous by thread:
**st: Re: Analysis of binary cluster data with missing values** - Next by thread:
**Re: st: Re: Analysis of binary cluster data with missing values** - Index(es):

© Copyright 1996–2017 StataCorp LLC | Terms of use | Privacy | Contact us | What's new | Site index |