[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date index][Thread index]

From |
Roger Newson <roger.newson@kcl.ac.uk> |

To |
statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu |

Subject |
Re: st: newbie question: nonsig posthoc after sig anova |

Date |
Mon, 18 Aug 2003 18:44:11 +0100 |

At 08:29 18/08/03 -0700, Jim Seward wrote:

An F-test comparing 5 groups is implicitly defining a 95% confidence region, in 4-dimensional "hyperspace", for 4 mean differences between the 4 non-reference groups and the reference group. Jim's "barely significant" P-value implies that this confidence region does not contain the vector of 4 zero mean differences, which would be the true population mean differences if all 5 groups had the same mean. However, the post-hoc tests seem to imply that the confidence region for the 4 mean differences might contain zero values for any of the 4 mean differences individually. Therefore, although it seems that at least one difference is non-zero, Jim has insufficient data to incriminate one of these differences as being "the culprit".I'm a new member to the list. My background is in neuropsychology rather than statistics so please excuse this naive question. I did a simple ANOVA comparing a mean score across five groups. The ANOVA was barely significanct (0.04) but in post hoc tests using Bonferroni, Scheffe and Sida none of the group mean differences were near significant (the largest group mean difference had a p of 0.14). Any explanation is appreciated.

Jim doesn't say what the ANOVA is about. However, most statisticians nowadays, most of the time, prefer confidence intervals to P-values alone, because P-values only measure the compatibility of the data with zero population differences, and do not give a range of positive and/or negative and/or zero population differences with which the data ARE compatible. A good introduction to confidence intervals, commonly used in the medical sector, is Altman et al. (2000).

I hope this helps.

Roger

Reference

Douglas Altman, David Machin, Trevor Bryant, Martin Gardner. Statistics with Confidence. London: British Medical Journal Books; 2000. ISBN: 0727913751

--

Roger Newson

Lecturer in Medical Statistics

Department of Public Health Sciences

King's College London

5th Floor, Capital House

42 Weston Street

London SE1 3QD

United Kingdom

Tel: 020 7848 6648 International +44 20 7848 6648

Fax: 020 7848 6620 International +44 20 7848 6620

or 020 7848 6605 International +44 20 7848 6605

Email: roger.newson@kcl.ac.uk

Website: http://www.kcl-phs.org.uk/rogernewson

Opinions expressed are those of the author, not the institution.

*

* For searches and help try:

* http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/res/findit.html

* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq

* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/

**Follow-Ups**:**RE: st: newbie question: nonsig posthoc after sig anova***From:*"Nick Cox" <n.j.cox@durham.ac.uk>

**References**:**st: newbie question: nonsig posthoc after sig anova***From:*Jim.Seward@sunhealth.org

- Prev by Date:
**Re: st: RE:mean+ci plot: how to do a ciplot with bar representation** - Next by Date:
**st: Intruments in XTABOND** - Previous by thread:
**st: newbie question: nonsig posthoc after sig anova** - Next by thread:
**RE: st: newbie question: nonsig posthoc after sig anova** - Index(es):

© Copyright 1996–2016 StataCorp LP | Terms of use | Privacy | Contact us | What's new | Site index |