Thanks very much for Weihua's advice.
I did try to delete "copy", but then I got the message " ufrom() must
specify a 1 x 31 matrix". Like I said in the last email, I followed David's
method and created a 1*30 matrix, but why -ufrom()- asked for a 1*31 matrix?
It is like, for instance, David created a 1*5 matrix of initial values, but
-ufrom()- asked for a 1*6 matrix.
Best
Xun
-----Original Message-----
From: Weihua Guan [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Thursday, July 10, 2003 12:25 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: st: Re: RE: Re: Initial values not feasible and -ufrom()- option.
--"Wu, Xun" <[email protected]> wrote,
> Thanks for Scott's information and David's method, I solve the initial
value
> problem in Frontier with the -from()- option .
>
> http://www.stata.com/statalist/archive/2003-05/msg00650.html
>
> However, when I was trying to fit a truncated-normal model, I still have a
> problem with option -ufrom()-.
>
> I follow David Drucker's method to feed my own initial values:
> 1. Run OLS
> 2. matrix b0 = e(b), ln(e(rmse)^2), .1
> 3. I add option to the frontier command: distribution(tnormal) ufrom(b0,
> copy)
>
> However, I always got a message "ufrom() must specify a matrix".
>
> Is there anything different with -ufrom()- option?
The -ufrom()- option is a little different from the regular -from()-.
Unlike
-from()-, -ufrom()- only takes a matrix. The syntax is like:
. frontier ..., ufrom(matname) ...
Xun should not specify ", copy" in his command.
Weihua Guan <[email protected]>
Stata Corp.
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/res/findit.html
* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/res/findit.html
* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
