[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date index][Thread index]

From |
David Airey <david.airey@vanderbilt.edu> |

To |
statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu |

Subject |
re: st: interactions |

Date |
Thu, 26 Jun 2003 09:07:04 -0500 |

Ernest,

I have not been able to use xi to create continuous*continuous interactions on the fly. I don't think xi does this from the description. It does cat*cont though. Desmat works with its own notation, but I've written with pen and paper the following program and would like some comments. The program is meant to create all two way interactions for a given set of continuous variables (e.g., a b c d):

* all two way interactions

program define atwi

syntax varlist (min 2 numeric)

local t = total number of variables <-- how do I get this?

tokenize `varlist'

for numlist j = 1(1)`t'-1 {

for numlist k = `j'+1(1)`t' {

generate ``j''x``k'' = ``j''*``k''

}

}

end

given a command like:

. atwi a b c d

it should kind of go through the loops to get:

j k generate

1 2 axb

3 axc

4 axd

2 3 bxc

4 bxd

3 4 cxd

and then I could type

atwi a b c d

regress Y a b c d a* b* c*

to get what I want, which is really a general linear test on adding all nway interaction at a certain level.

Any comments welcome before I try it out with a do file.

-Dave

What's the easiest way to generate all:xi can do continuous variables as well, but only twoway. There are two options that I would think of:

2 way interactions

3 way interactions

.

.

.

n way interactions

when you have many continuous variables to predict a continuous response?

xi seems to only be nice to me with categorical or dummy variables.

1. use desmat (I have no experience with it myself but it seems a good solution and often used around here)

2. create all interaction-variables manually yourself with nested foreach/forvalues loops.

* * For searches and help try: * http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/res/findit.html * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/

**Follow-Ups**:**re: st: interactions***From:*"R. Allan Reese" <R.A.Reese@hull.ac.uk>

**re: st: interactions***From:*Ernest Berkhout <ernestb@seo.fee.uva.nl>

**RE: st: interactions***From:*"Nick Cox" <n.j.cox@durham.ac.uk>

- Prev by Date:
**st: xtprvalue?** - Next by Date:
**RE: st: interactions** - Previous by thread:
**Re: st: interactions** - Next by thread:
**RE: st: interactions** - Index(es):

© Copyright 1996–2016 StataCorp LP | Terms of use | Privacy | Contact us | What's new | Site index |