[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date index][Thread index]

From |
Lee Sieswerda <Lee.Sieswerda@tbdhu.com> |

To |
"'statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu'" <statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu> |

Subject |
st: RE: [sampling in Cox model] |

Date |
Thu, 19 Jun 2003 11:23:51 -0400 |

This answer is perhaps going in a different direction; that is, a design direction rather than a statistical direction. But there is the nested case control study, which is commonly used within large cohorts to test specific hypotheses. The selection of controls can be tricky, but because much is known about the participants owing to their participation in the cohort, bias and confounding can often be well controlled. The main problem in case-control studies is usually recall bias, but that is largely eliminated in the nested study. Bias related to time is handled by selecting controls from the same time period as the cases. The purpose of the nested case-control study is not usually improved precision, but rather convenience. At the edges of my recall, though, I seem to remember that there are situations where the nested case-control design can be more efficient than the cohort analysis. However, I'll stop right there because I'm not in any way an expert on this kind of study. There are some on this list that are, I suspect. There was a three-part series in the American Journal of Epidemiology a while back on nested case-control studies. Wacholder S, McLaughline Jk, Silverman DT, Mandel JS. Selection of controls in case-control studies. I. Principles. Am J Epidemiol 1992; 135:1019-1028. Ibid. II. Types of Controls. Am J Epidemiol 1992; 135: 1029-1041. Ibid. III. Design Options. Am J Epidemiol 1992; 135: 1042-1050. However, in this particular case, there doesn't seem to be much need for a nested case-control study. As Ronan pointed out, Stata can probably handle the full data set and RAM is cheap. Best, Lee Lee Sieswerda, Epidemiologist Thunder Bay District Health Unit Lee.Sieswerda@tbdhu.com -----Original Message----- From: FEIVESON, ALAN H. (AL) (JSC-SK) (NASA) [mailto:alan.h.feiveson@nasa.gov] Sent: Thursday, June 19, 2003 9:35 AM To: 'statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu' Subject: st: [sampling in Cox model] This raises an interesting question. Clearly, one could take an "upstream" that is, a purely blinded sample and run it. But is there a more efficient way? For example, if you just used the failures, you would bias your estimates of the coefficients, but in some sense you would gain precision. So I'm wondering if there is a way of informative sampling (that is purposely choosing a preponderance of failures) and somehow correcting for bias? If you did this, would the estimates be any more accurate than if you had just taken a noninformative sample to begin with? Al Feiveson -----Original Message----- From: Nick Cox [mailto:n.j.cox@durham.ac.uk] Sent: Wednesday, June 18, 2003 6:00 PM To: statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu Subject: st: RE: [Cox model] roger webb > I need to run a Cox model on a very large cohort (of approximately 1.5 > million subjects). Has anyone implemented a memory efficient routine > that uses a sample from (as opposed to all) the individuals at risk? Nothing to do with me, but I doubt that there is amy special procedure needed here. That is, you just should take a sample upstream and then fit a Cox model on the sample data, I guess. Nick n.j.cox@durham.ac.uk * * For searches and help try: * http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/res/findit.html * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/ * * For searches and help try: * http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/res/findit.html * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/ * * For searches and help try: * http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/res/findit.html * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/

**Follow-Ups**:**Re: st: RE: [sampling in Cox model]***From:*Enzo Coviello <enzo.coviello@tin.it>

- Prev by Date:
**st: RE: RE: [Cox model]** - Next by Date:
**st: histogram title** - Previous by thread:
**st: RE: RE: [Cox model]** - Next by thread:
**Re: st: RE: [sampling in Cox model]** - Index(es):

© Copyright 1996–2016 StataCorp LP | Terms of use | Privacy | Contact us | What's new | Site index |