[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date index][Thread index]
Re: st: RE: qreg
Please do tell me more, thank you!
At 11:56 AM 2003-02-26 -0500, you wrote:
>As far as I know, qreq does not produce the right SEs. There are several
>ways to construct standard error. I will tell further if you cannot
>find ways to construct SEs.
>[mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org] On Behalf Of Frank Eaton
>Sent: Wednesday, February 26, 2003 2:29 PM
>Subject: st: qreg
>I posted the following message a couple of weeks ago and have had no
>replies. Did it get lost in the debate over picketing? Anyway, can
>provide any advice?
>>Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2003 09:07:01 -0800
>>From: Frank Eaton <FEaton@NFOCFgroup.com>
>>My attempts to run qreg yield plausible parameter estimates, but the
>are all very small, such as 3.92e-14. Does anyone have an idea what
>cause this problem? Is it something in my data? All help appreciated.
>Frank Eaton, Principal
>ARC Applied Research Consultants (division of NFO CFgroup)
>112 Kent Street, Suite 2010A
>Ottawa, Ontario K1P 5P2
>Telephone: (613) 230-4931
>Fax: (613) 232-7102
>* For searches and help try:
>Attachment Converted: D:\Z\Eudora Attachments\Shinkyu Yang.vcf
* For searches and help try: