[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date index][Thread index]

From |
"Tracy Waldon" <TWALDON@fcc.gov> |

To |
<statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu> |

Subject |
Re: st: Constrained estimation, simultaneous for two seperate groups? |

Date |
Fri, 6 Dec 2002 10:19:00 -0500 |

Ernest, I think you were unclear and maybe wanting what can only be provided through customization. If my guess about your "interactions" is correct (you expanded X2,...,Xk to be X2m,...,Xkm,X2f,...Xkf where f and m denote male and female and then ran the regression on the pooled data), then you're not having any trouble estimating what you want. The problem is you only care about the one constrained parameter on X1. But you get two estimated coefficients (male and female) for all the unconstrained independent variables which number in the hundreds. Yea, that's some ugly output. Stata can't guess at which parameter you really care about so it gives them all to you. I'm not too clever with Stata programming, so I just write little ado files specific to the problem. Since you can access most of the output of the previous regression through the saved results in e(.), just write a little ado to display those that you care about. After running the regression and letting the output scroll by, run the ado and have it display the parameters and test statistics you are interested in. As far as using reg3 goes, I think what you really wanted was sureg (you'll need to restructure your data as well I suspect). Then you could impose the constraint. But you will still get the masses of output as long as you are estimating that many parameters. Tracy >>> Ernest Berkhout 12/06/02 03:53AM >>> Hello Statalisters, two days ago I posted my problem to the Statalist but up to now there was no response. Was it a stupid question, or was I unclear maybe? If the first is true than please tell me why because i'm apparently quite ignorant, otherwise i'll try to be more clear. What i want to do is - a simple OLS regression of say Y on X1, X2...Xk for two different groups (men & women). But I want to - impose the restrictions that for say X1 the coefficients for both groups are the same. Of course one can estimate a single regression with interaction terms for all X2..Xn but that way the output will be immense in my case where there are >100 dummyvariables to be estimated (because there will be 3rd-order interactions then as well). I wondered if there would be a more efficient solution within Stata. I tried the <reg3> with <constraint>, but that doesn't work because there are no overlapping records between the first group (men) and the second group (women). The errorcode I get is 'not enough observations'. So the real problem is that when I use a single equation with nearly full interaction I get a list with over a 100 interactionterms which is not readable anymore. Will the above solution, estimating simultanously, be a valid alternative or is maybe someone aware of an ado-program that will restructure the output in a more manageable form? Thanks in advance, Ernest Berkhout Stichting voor Economisch Onderzoek Universiteit van Amsterdam De SEO is verhuisd! Tegenwoordig ben ik bereikbaar op: Kamer 3.08 Roetersstraat 29 1018 WB Amsterdam tel.:+ 31 20 525 1630 fax:+ 31 20 525 1686 http://www.seo.nl ================================= "To an economist, real life is a special case" ================================= * * For searches and help try: * http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/res/findit.html * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/ * * For searches and help try: * http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/res/findit.html * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/

**Follow-Ups**:**Re: st: Constrained estimation, simultaneous for two seperate groups?***From:*"Scott Merryman" <smerryman@kc.rr.com>

- Prev by Date:
**st: RE: time series** - Next by Date:
**st: on LBI test statistic of xtregar comments welcome!** - Previous by thread:
**st: RE: RE: graphs/ksm** - Next by thread:
**Re: st: Constrained estimation, simultaneous for two seperate groups?** - Index(es):

© Copyright 1996–2016 StataCorp LP | Terms of use | Privacy | Contact us | What's new | Site index |