[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date index][Thread index]

From |
Marcello Pagano <pagano@hsph.harvard.edu> |

To |
statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu |

Subject |
Re: st: RE: RE: RE: A simple but really hard question |

Date |
Wed, 30 Oct 2002 17:34:48 -0500 |

One should shoot for inclusiveness! Eclecticism! m.p. Nick Cox wrote:

Marcello Pagano

Come on, Marcello, we'd expect you to supportHexadeciles?

all Latin, if anything. "hexadecile" is yet another mongrel. The fact that there is a good precedent is neither

here nor there.

Nick n.j.cox@durham.ac.uk

* * For searches and help try: * http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/res/findit.html * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/

**References**:**RE: st: RE: RE: RE: A simple but really hard question***From:*"Nick Cox" <n.j.cox@durham.ac.uk>

- Prev by Date:
**RE: st: RE: RE: RE: A simple but really hard question** - Next by Date:
**Re: st: [Question on Cauchy distribution]** - Previous by thread:
**RE: st: RE: RE: RE: A simple but really hard question** - Next by thread:
**Re: st: RE: RE: RE: A simple but really hard question** - Index(es):

© Copyright 1996–2017 StataCorp LLC | Terms of use | Privacy | Contact us | What's new | Site index |