[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date index][Thread index]

From |
khigbee@stata.com |

To |
statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu |

Subject |
Re: st: ANOVA model |

Date |
Sat, 28 Sep 2002 10:51:38 -0500 |

David Airey <david.airey@Vanderbilt.Edu> asks: > I am having trouble deciding on the right Stata command to estimate the > following ANOVA model: > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > Animal 1 2 3 4 5 > / \ / \ / \ / \ / \ > Location 1 2 1 2 1 2 1 2 1 2 > / \ / \ / \ / \ / \ / \ / \ / \ / \ / \ > Neuron 01-03 04-06 07-10 11-12 13-15 16-18 19-21 22-24 25-27 28-30 > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > In this design, we have as sources of variation, different neurons > measured from the same location in the brain, different locations, and > different animals: > > µ = population mean > a = animal effect > l = location effect > n = neuron effect <- this might just be in the error > e = error > > or the measure for a neuron Y = µ + a + l + (n + e) > > So I think I should have a fixed effect for location (we are interested > in the mean difference between locations and we assigned the locations) > and two random effects, one for animal, and one for replicate neurons > (random because we are not interested really in the mean differences > but just accounting for the variance and because they are animals or > neurons selected from a larger population, presumably with equal > probability). I am guessing I need to nest neuron in location and treat > animal as a random block effect, but at usual, can decide on the proper > test constructions. Take a look at the example starting on page 46 of "[R] anova" in the Version 7 reference manual. Your model is almost the same. In your case, since there are only two locations, you can ignore the -repeated()- option since with only two levels the repeated measures analysis produces the same results as without it. You will end up with something like anova y a / n|a l / l*a / What may be needed depending on exactly how your data are set up is to reorganize your data in some way. Here are the first 20 observations from the dataset used in the glucose example from the manual. . use http://www.stata-press.com/data/r7/glucose.dta (Brain Glucose Data) . list in 1/20 glucose region subject rep 1. 73 1 1 1 2. 75 1 1 2 3. 77 1 1 3 4. 80 1 1 4 5. 72 2 1 1 6. 78 2 1 2 7. 70 2 1 3 8. 69 2 1 4 9. 93 3 1 1 10. 92 3 1 2 11. 91 3 1 3 12. 83 3 1 4 13. 74 1 2 1 14. 63 1 2 2 15. 67 1 2 3 16. 68 1 2 4 17. 72 2 2 1 18. 75 2 2 2 19. 66 2 2 3 20. 67 2 2 4 Just a footnote. You can find the datasets used in the manual by going to http://www.stata-press.com/data/r7/ and you can -use- them directly in Stata as I demonstrated above. Ken Higbee khigbee@stata.com StataCorp 1-800-STATAPC * * For searches and help try: * http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/res/findit.html * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/

- Prev by Date:
**st: Utility for clarify** - Next by Date:
**st: xtiles....** - Previous by thread:
**st: ANOVA model** - Next by thread:
**st: Utility for clarify** - Index(es):

© Copyright 1996–2016 StataCorp LP | Terms of use | Privacy | Contact us | What's new | Site index |