[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date index][Thread index]
Re: st: Re: NaN (the inedible kind)
Christopher F Baum <firstname.lastname@example.org> writes:
> IMHO Stata does NOT make use of NaNs, which have the properties
> that missing values should have
> (i.e. any op involving a NaN
> evaluates to a NaN).
> Stata does not--it allows missing values to be treated as
> a very large positive number--and that has been the topic of
> discussion at 'wishes and grumbles' sessions at SUG meetings.
Grumble, grumble... missing values are the only thing I find clumsy
Brendan Halpin, Dept of Government and Society, Limerick University, Ireland
Tel: w +353-61-213147 f +353-61-202569 h +353-61-390476; Room F2-025 x 3147
* For searches and help try: