Stata The Stata listserver
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date index][Thread index]

Re: FW: st: Random effects probit


From   "Guillaume Frechette" <gurst1@hotmail.com>
To   d.mueller@agr.uni-goettingen.de
Subject   Re: FW: st: Random effects probit
Date   Mon, 16 Sep 2002 19:55:09 +0000

Daniel Müller <d.mueller@agr.uni-goettingen.de> wrote:
Guillaume,

could you pls add the Stata answer you mention in your post on missing std
err.

thanks, cheers,
Daniel
Ooops, sorry about that. Here it is:

Dear Guillaume,

In general, it means that the standard error could not be identified. Another
way of saying the same thing is that the variance-covariance matrix does not
have full rank. collinearity is the most common cause. The fact that the
problem arises when you cl uster is not surprising. If you think of clusters
as superobservations, clustering can drastically reduce the rank of your data
matrix (design matrix), i.e., in reality you have fewer observations, you can
drastically reduce the overall variation in your data , making collinearity
more likely to be present.


Sincerely,

Allen McDowell

_________________________________________________________________
MSN Photos is the easiest way to share and print your photos: http://photos.msn.com/support/worldwide.aspx

*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/res/findit.html
* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/




© Copyright 1996–2014 StataCorp LP   |   Terms of use   |   Privacy   |   Contact us   |   What's new   |   Site index